Zero Trust Compliance

We map your zero trust controls to specific compliance requirements: mTLS satisfies encryption-in-transit requirements, RBAC satisfies access control requirements, access logging satisfies audit trail requirements, and device posture checks satisfy endpoint security requirements. The mapping identifies which compliance controls are already satisfied by zero trust, which need additional implementation, and which are not addressable by infrastructure alone.

Zero trust covers most technical controls but compliance also requires policies, procedures, and organizational controls. We identify gaps: missing acceptable use policies, incomplete incident response procedures, undocumented data classification, or missing vendor security assessments. Each gap gets a remediation plan with effort estimate and priority based on audit timeline and risk.

Manual evidence collection is the bottleneck of every audit. We automate it: access review reports generate monthly from your IAM logs, encryption status reports pull from your infrastructure configuration, vulnerability scan results aggregate automatically, and change management evidence exports from your Git history and deployment logs. Evidence is stored in a compliance platform (Vanta, Drata, or custom) and refreshes continuously.

Compliance is not a point-in-time assessment. We configure continuous monitoring that alerts when controls drift: a new service deployed without encryption, an IAM policy created with excessive permissions, a firewall rule opened too broadly, or an access review deadline missed. Drift detection catches compliance violations within hours instead of at the next annual audit, when remediation is expensive and embarrassing.