obfs4 bridges use a fixed IP that users must know in advance. When censors block that IP, the bridge is dead until a new one is distributed. Snowflake proxies are ephemeral from the client perspective: the Snowflake broker matches Tor clients with available proxies dynamically, so clients never know or need a specific proxy IP in advance. Censoring Snowflake requires blocking the broker endpoint itself, which is behind domain fronting on major cloud providers.
The cost of this architecture is throughput. WebRTC adds overhead compared to raw TCP, and TURN relay adds another hop when direct WebRTC is unavailable. Snowflake is excellent for users who need to get online at all, not for users who need sustained high-bandwidth connections. A dedicated VPS proxy operates as a standalone rather than browser-based instance, giving it much higher sustained throughput and uptime than the typical volunteer browser extension.
Operators who want to serve both latency-sensitive and high-throughput users should run both obfs4 and Snowflake in parallel on separate infrastructure. The resource requirements for a Snowflake standalone proxy are modest: 1 vCPU and 512 MB RAM is sufficient for dozens of concurrent WebRTC sessions.