Before building the technical setup, clarify your specific threat model. Who are you protecting yourself from? A bridge operator in a country where running circumvention infrastructure risks imprisonment faces a fundamentally different threat than an operator in a Western country who simply prefers privacy. The technical measures appropriate to each situation differ significantly.
High threat model: you face active intelligence service surveillance, legal risk from law enforcement, or risk of physical harm. This requires compartmentalization at every level: separate devices, separate internet connections potentially including Tor itself for setup, separate email identities with no real-world linkage, and cryptocurrency that is genuinely anonymous through Monero or well-mixed Bitcoin.
Moderate threat model: you prefer not to have your name associated with bridge operation for professional or social reasons, but face no active surveillance. Standard privacy practices including pseudonymous email, VPN for setup, and basic cryptocurrency privacy are sufficient.
Understanding your actual threat model prevents both under-investment in security for high-risk operators and excessive complexity for moderate-risk operators who end up abandoning the effort because the overhead is unsustainable.